This video segment describes a situation where the interviewee took an unpopular stance in a meeting with leadership.
- Identified the Conflict: The interviewee disagreed with the company's decision to significantly shift resources from the US to India for customer support, primarily driven by cost-cutting measures.
- Presented an Alternative Solution: Despite the potential for backlash, the interviewee proposed an alternative solution:
- While acknowledging the cost-effectiveness of hiring in India, they suggested leveraging the "Year Up" program to hire underrepresented talent in the US, aligning with the company's diversity and inclusion goals.
- Faced Opposition: The interviewee faced strong opposition from the CFO, who was primarily focused on cost-cutting measures and reacted negatively to the alternative proposal.
- Continued to Advocate: Despite the initial setback and lack of immediate recognition, the interviewee continued to advocate for the inclusion of the "Year Up" program.
- Achieved Partial Success: While the initial proposal was largely dismissed, the company eventually implemented a limited version of the "Year Up" program, demonstrating the long-term impact of the interviewee's advocacy.
This example highlights the interviewee's: Proactive Approach: They identified a potential solution that aligned with company values. Courage and Persistence: They were willing to express their dissenting opinion despite potential negative consequences. Focus on Long-Term Impact: They demonstrated a commitment to long-term goals, such as diversity and inclusion, even when faced with immediate pressures. Ability to Learn and Adapt: They acknowledged the limitations of their initial approach and demonstrated a willingness to adapt and find alternative solutions.
Learn more about Alan's job search program, Kadima Careers, using this discount link.