Design an API to display the total number of iOS downloads from different devices in a graph.
This document outlines the design of an API to display the total number of iOS downloads from different devices in a graph format. This API will provide the data necessary to visualize download trends across various iOS devices, helping understand user adoption and platform preferences.
The system will consist of the following components:
Diagram:
[API Gateway] --> [Authentication/Authorization Service]
[API Gateway] --> [Download Statistics Service]
[Download Statistics Service] --> [Caching Layer]
[Download Statistics Service] --> [Database]
We will use a relational database to store the download event data. Here's the schema for the downloads
table:
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
id | INT | Primary key, auto-increment |
device_type | VARCHAR | Type of iOS device (e.g., iPhone 13, iPad Pro) |
download_date | TIMESTAMP | Date and time of the download |
app_id | INT | ID of the downloaded application |
/api/v1/downloads/ios/stats
Method: GET
Description: Retrieves download statistics for iOS devices.
Request Parameters:
start_date
(string, optional): Start date for the statistics (YYYY-MM-DD). Defaults to 30 days ago.end_date
(string, optional): End date for the statistics (YYYY-MM-DD). Defaults to today.device_type
(string, optional): Filter by a specific device type (e.g., iPhone 13). If not provided, returns data for all devices.granularity
(string, optional): Granularity of the data (daily, weekly, monthly). Defaults to daily.Request Example:
/api/v1/downloads/ios/stats?start_date=2024-01-01&end_date=2024-01-31&device_type=iPhone%2013&granularity=monthly
Response JSON:
{
"status": "success",
"data": [
{
"date": "2024-01-01",
"device_type": "iPhone 13",
"downloads": 12345
},
{
"date": "2024-01-08",
"device_type": "iPhone 13",
"downloads": 67890
},
{
"date": "2024-01-15",
"device_type": "iPhone 13",
"downloads": 45678
}
]
}
Feature | Approach | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|
Database | Relational Database (e.g., PostgreSQL) | Strong consistency, ACID properties, mature technology | Can be more complex to scale horizontally compared to NoSQL databases |
Caching | Redis | Fast read/write, in-memory data storage, supports various data structures | Data loss on failure if not configured for persistence |
Data Aggregation | Performed at query time | More up-to-date data, simpler data storage | Can be slower for large datasets |
Authentication/Authorization | OAuth 2.0 | Industry standard, supports delegation of access, secure | Requires integration with an identity provider |
Granularity | Pre-calculated aggregates (daily, weekly, monthly) | Faster retrieval for common granularities | Requires more storage and maintenance of aggregated data |