Software Engineer, Trusted Execution (Security)

Apple

Given a string expression of numbers and operators, return all possible results from computing all the different possible ways to group numbers and operators. You may return the answer in any order. The test cases are generated such that the output values fit in a 32-bit integer and the number of different results does not exceed 104. For example: If the input is expression = 2-1-1 The expected output is [0,2] Because: ((2-1)-1) = 0 (2-(1-1)) = 2 If the input is expression = 23-45 The expected output is [-34,-14,-10,-10,10] Because: (2(3-(45))) = -34 ((23)-(45)) = -14 ((2(3-4))5) = -10 (2((3-4)5)) = -10 (((23)-4)5) = 10 Constraints: 1 <= expression.length <= 20 expression consists of digits and the operator '+', '-', and '*'. All the integer values in the input expression are in the range [0, 99]. The integer values in the input expression do not have a leading '-' or '+' denoting the sign.

Apple

Let's delve into the fascinating world of computer systems. I'd like you to design a simplified operating system. Assume you're building this OS for a resource-constrained embedded system, like a smart thermostat or a simple microcontroller-based device. Your design should address the following key aspects: Memory Management: Describe your approach to memory allocation and deallocation. How would you prevent memory leaks and fragmentation in this environment? Would you use static allocation, dynamic allocation, or a combination of both? Explain your reasoning, giving specific examples of how your chosen methods would work in practice. Process/Task Scheduling: How would you schedule tasks to run on the processor? Would you opt for a preemptive or non-preemptive scheduler? What scheduling algorithm (e.g., Round Robin, Priority-based) would you use, and why? Consider the trade-offs between responsiveness, fairness, and overhead. Imagine you have three tasks: Task A (high priority, short bursts), Task B (medium priority, longer computation), and Task C (low priority, background task). How would your scheduler handle these tasks? Interrupt Handling: Explain how your OS would handle interrupts from hardware devices (e.g., a temperature sensor, a button press). How would you ensure that interrupt handlers are efficient and don't disrupt the normal operation of the system? Describe the steps involved in processing an interrupt, from the moment it occurs to the point where the interrupted task resumes execution. File System (Optional): If your embedded system requires persistent storage, outline a simple file system design. How would you organize files and directories? What data structures would you use to track file metadata (e.g., name, size, location)? How would you handle file creation, deletion, and reading/writing operations? Assume the storage medium is a small flash memory chip with limited write cycles. Inter-Process Communication (IPC): How would different tasks or processes communicate with each other within your OS? Would you use message queues, shared memory, or another mechanism? Explain the advantages and disadvantages of your chosen approach. For example, consider a scenario where one task needs to send sensor data to another task for processing. How would you implement this communication? Remember to justify your design choices based on the constraints of the embedded system, such as limited memory, processing power, and energy consumption. Aim for simplicity, efficiency, and reliability in your design. Your explanation should demonstrate a solid understanding of operating system principles and their practical application in a real-world scenario.

Apple

Let's explore the concept of feedback amplifiers in the context of software development teams. Imagine you are leading a team working on a critical feature for a new mobile application. Communication bottlenecks and misunderstandings are starting to impact the team's velocity and morale. As a senior engineer, you recognize the need to amplify feedback loops to improve team performance. Describe what a feedback amplifier is and how it works in practice.** Provide concrete examples of how you would implement feedback amplifiers within your team. Consider different types of feedback, such as code reviews, sprint retrospectives, and individual performance reviews. Explain the benefits of using feedback amplifiers.** How can they improve code quality, reduce bugs, and increase team collaboration? Quantify the potential impact using hypothetical scenarios or past experiences. For instance, how might more frequent code reviews, coupled with automated static analysis, lead to a measurable reduction in the number of bugs discovered in production? Discuss the potential challenges and pitfalls of implementing feedback amplifiers.** What steps would you take to mitigate these risks? Think about issues like information overload, negative feedback bias, and the time investment required to implement and maintain effective feedback loops. How would you ensure that the feedback process remains constructive, fair, and actionable for all team members? Elaborate on your answer by considering specific tools or techniques you have used in the past to amplify feedback, such as using dashboards to visualize key performance indicators, conducting regular pulse surveys to gauge team sentiment, or establishing a system for tracking and resolving action items from retrospective meetings. Also, discuss how you would tailor your approach based on the size and structure of the team, as well as the specific project goals and constraints.