Customer Engineer III, Platform, Mid-Market Enterprise Greenfield, Google Cloud

Google

Tic-tac-toe is played by two players A and B on a 3 x 3 grid. The rules of Tic-Tac-Toe are: Players take turns placing characters into empty squares ''. The first player A always places 'X' characters, while the second player B always places 'O' characters. 'X' and 'O' characters are always placed into empty squares, never on filled ones. The game ends when there are three of the same (non-empty) character filling any row, column, or diagonal. The game also ends if all squares are non-empty. No more moves can be played if the game is over. Given a 2D integer array moves where moves[i] = [rowi, coli] indicates that the ith move will be played on gridrowi. return the winner of the game if it exists (A or B). In case the game ends in a draw return Draw. If there are still movements to play return Pending. You can assume that moves is valid (i.e., it follows the rules of Tic-Tac-Toe), the grid is initially empty, and A will play first. For example: moves = [[0,0],[2,0],[1,1],[2,1],[2,2]] Output: A moves = [[0,0],[1,1],[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[2,0]] Output: B moves = [[0,0],[1,1],[2,0],[1,0],[1,2],[2,1],[0,1],[0,2],[2,2]] Output: Draw

Google

Let's design a simplified distributed key-value store. Assume we need to handle a high volume of read and write requests. The key-value store should support the following operations: get(key): Retrieves the value associated with the given key. put(key, value): Stores the value associated with the given key. Here are some specific considerations for the design: Scalability: The system should be able to scale horizontally to handle increasing amounts of data and traffic. Consider how data will be distributed across multiple servers. Consistency: Discuss the consistency model you would implement. Would you choose strong consistency or eventual consistency? What are the trade-offs? Provide a rationale for your choice. Elaborate on how your design ensures that reads return the most up-to-date data (or how it handles potential inconsistencies, if any). Fault Tolerance: How would the system handle server failures? Describe the mechanisms you would implement to ensure data durability and availability in the face of node failures. Explain the role of replication and how it impacts consistency. Data Partitioning: Describe your data partitioning strategy. Consider using techniques like consistent hashing or range-based partitioning. Explain how your chosen strategy affects load balancing and data locality. Provide a concrete example of how keys would be mapped to specific servers in your design. Caching: Where would you incorporate caching in your system to improve read performance? Discuss different caching strategies (e.g., client-side caching, server-side caching) and their implications. Walk me through the architectural components of your key-value store, including the roles of different servers, the communication protocols used, and the data flow for get and put operations. Explain any potential bottlenecks and how you would address them. For example, if consistent hashing is used, how do you handle nodes being added or removed from the cluster?

Google

Can you describe a time you had to work with a difficult team member and how you handled the situation? This is a common behavioral interview question designed to assess your interpersonal skills, conflict resolution abilities, and ability to work effectively in a team environment, even when faced with challenges. When answering this question, it's crucial to provide a specific example, detailing the situation, your actions, and the resulting outcome. This allows the interviewer to understand your approach and evaluate your effectiveness. For instance, you might discuss a project where a team member consistently missed deadlines, hindering the team's progress. In your response, you should: Describe the Situation: Clearly outline the project, the team member's role, and the specific behaviors that made them difficult to work with (e.g., missed deadlines, lack of communication, negative attitude). Be objective and avoid accusatory language. Explain Your Actions: Detail the steps you took to address the situation. Did you have a one-on-one conversation with the team member? Did you involve a supervisor or mentor? Did you try to understand the reasons behind their behavior? Did you adjust your own approach to accommodate their needs? Highlight the Result: Explain the outcome of your actions. Were you able to resolve the issue? Did the team member improve their performance? What did you learn from the experience? Even if the outcome wasn't ideal, focus on the lessons learned and how you would approach a similar situation in the future. Remember, the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) can be a helpful framework for structuring your answer. The interviewer wants to see that you can navigate challenging interpersonal dynamics professionally and contribute to a positive team environment.