A recruiter is offering to interview with me in-person since they happen to be in the area, but they are happy to take the meeting online as well. I’m wondering what would be the better option? I’m leaning towards online but it seems that they’re pushing for an in-person interview.
In my case, I wouldn’t need to travel too far to meet with the recruiter. Wondering what the pros and cons to an in-person interview are, and how it compares to a virtual one?
You should definitely meet them in-person. I think this increases your chances of passing by at least 10%.
There are many reasons why:
If you have solid communication and social skills, all the reasons above will be amplified and can increase your chances of passing by +50%.
The benefits of doing the interview virtually are all related to remote work in general (no commute time, more comfortable, you don't have to care about your appearance as much), not interview pass rate.
Back when I was interviewing at Meta, I was given the choice of doing the technical phone screen in-person or virtually. I did it in-person, and it was totally worth it.
It's much, much easier to build trust in person. In a vacuum, I'd opt for that. However, it obviously takes more time and money to travel, so you need to judge the opportunity cost.
Check the commitment level from the other side before you meet them. This comes in two forms: