A realistic example would be if you are offered at a time the stock price of a company is 50% below it's all time high. Do they try to offer someone 50% less in stock grants in USD. Keeping the number of units of stocks given the same?
Yes. However, the grant doesn't vary in dollars but in the # of shares.
For these big public companies, they have a target comp in mind for every employee. Let's say they have chosen $200k target comp for a Google L3 like yourself and your base salary is $150k. That means they want to give you $50k worth of Google stock every year:
Tactically, this means you want to join the company when the stock is low so that it rises during your time at the company. Since the grant is locked to # of shares (it doesn't dynamically go up or down based on price), this scenario means you are getting a raise without having done anything.
On the flip side, if the company's stock drops while you're there, you have functionally gotten a pay cut due to your RSU grant losing value.
Many companies don't like this comp volatility, so they are shortening the grant duration from 4 years down to 2 or even 1 year. My former company Robinhood is on 1-year grants now. This caps both upside and downside so your floor and ceiling are closer to one another.
I recommend watching our comp masterclass as well: [Masterclass] Understanding And Optimizing Your Pay In Tech
I talk about the dynamics of the stock price here: Rahul's Compensation Journey To $800K (and behind-the-scenes)
tl;dr The company will fulfill the promise of the dollar value of its offer. But once you start at the company, this dollar value gets translated into a certain number of shares, the value of which will go up or down based on the market.
This leads to some weird incentives, as you call out. For example:
In both cases, and especially in the case of Snap, you weridly hoping that the stock crashes right before you join. And then you hope that the stock recovers after the translation happens between $$ and # of shares.
The other interesting consequence of this model is around the vesting period. If a company does a standard 4-year cliff, you've "locked in" the price from your start date. So if the company goes up 5x in value, you are being dramatically overpaid in the latter years.
To combat this (on both the upside and downside), some companies have started to give out 1 year stock grants, so you are guaranteed a certain dollar value each year based on the company share price at that time.